Friday, November 27, 2009
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Street Smarts vs. Book Smarts
"I am not book smart, but I am street smart." I hate this saying... mostly because I am a cynic and only hear: "I am not book smart, but I am not smart." Yes, I know that many people disagree with that... I don't care, unless you can give me an example of "street smart" that does not use Common Sense, Social Awareness/Aptitude, or Emotional cognizance as an example of "street smarts." I mean, what is "street smart" anyway? The ability to live on the street, if you needed to? If that is the case, then I would have to argue that many "book smart" people also possess this ability.
Fun "fact"*
The real definition of Street Smarts is rarely, if ever actually applicable to those that claim to have it. The term comes from Wall Street (often called 'the street' in NYC), during the Gilded Age. Back when Andrew Carnegie and John Rockefeller ruled the financial world. It was meant to describe those people that traded on Wall Street that were not Ivy League educated, but knew 'the street' in such a way that they still made money. Hence, "street smart." But this would mean, that they were still really rather bright and could understand how to analyze a security properly to determine its real/fair value. It also means they probably had at least a fair-to-middling ability at mathematics. So really, if you aren't "book smart" (educated) but you are ACTUALLY smart and have learned a trade/skill, then I will leave you alone about saying that. But if you use that line as an excuse for why you hate math or don't succeed in school... then you are not "street smart" either. In both cases (book and street) it implies the ability to learn when given the opportunity. So if you are "street smart" then you can become "book smart."
okay... I am done. Let the hate filled argument commence!
* I am not sure how factual it really is, there was very little vetting on my part. It sounds legitimate...
Fun "fact"*
The real definition of Street Smarts is rarely, if ever actually applicable to those that claim to have it. The term comes from Wall Street (often called 'the street' in NYC), during the Gilded Age. Back when Andrew Carnegie and John Rockefeller ruled the financial world. It was meant to describe those people that traded on Wall Street that were not Ivy League educated, but knew 'the street' in such a way that they still made money. Hence, "street smart." But this would mean, that they were still really rather bright and could understand how to analyze a security properly to determine its real/fair value. It also means they probably had at least a fair-to-middling ability at mathematics. So really, if you aren't "book smart" (educated) but you are ACTUALLY smart and have learned a trade/skill, then I will leave you alone about saying that. But if you use that line as an excuse for why you hate math or don't succeed in school... then you are not "street smart" either. In both cases (book and street) it implies the ability to learn when given the opportunity. So if you are "street smart" then you can become "book smart."
okay... I am done. Let the hate filled argument commence!
* I am not sure how factual it really is, there was very little vetting on my part. It sounds legitimate...
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Freudian Slips that reveal the truth
This is an actual conversation that a friend and I had on Google Chat.
This was possibly the greatest Freudian slip ever. I think deep down he knows that it will be my title in the history books. MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! (appropriately evil laugh).
me: well maybe you should.
you are going to have to be our sales man
cause i am way to abrasive to do it. lol.
Eric: Jahangir you were a missionary same thing
Eric: Jahangir you were a missionary same thing
That was hahaha at the first
me: ahahah. dude. was that a Freudian slip?
me: ahahah. dude. was that a Freudian slip?
do you know what Jahangir means in Persian?
This was possibly the greatest Freudian slip ever. I think deep down he knows that it will be my title in the history books. MWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! (appropriately evil laugh).
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
always yield to the train.
The train ahead of mine hit a car today, delaying us by over 3 hours. But more importantly, I want to stress that cars ALWAYS yield to trains. Period. No exceptions. I believe that this rule was established on physics, though I would imagine most would think common sense would dictate this adamant rule. Unfortunately, "common sense" is far from common.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)